Pre-orders and Suchlike
In a lengthy post, HippyDave considers the pre-order campaigns from the likes of Marillion, The Reasoning and Mostly Autumn, and ponders the state of the music industry.
Could the labels have become their own worst enemies by not seeing/appreciating that some of these bands, with their established cult followings, might not be mainstream but would be a sound, long-term investment prospect? The industry is often - and rightly - pilloried for just this reason: the major labels have become so used to “firework” acts (one big bang and then it’s all over) that they’ve stopped looking at acts that require nurturing and time to produce their best work. There’s no way a band like Pink Floyd would have made it past their first two albums in the current climate, for instance: the suits would have listened to A Saucerful Of Secrets, decided that the band had lost the plot, and given them the axe. Yet look at the spectacular record sales that Floyd have accumulated over the years since - all because their label was willing to bankroll their development. Now, bands have to deliver the goods instantly or face being dropped. It’s all about sales, not artistry.
This is not a new argument - it’s been rehashed over and over since the late 70s, when disco - and then punk - arrived. However, as genres of music have increasingly fractured over the past two decades, so we have now arrived at a point in time where the music produced is more diverse and - in my opinion, of course - interesting than ever before - and yet the labels are playing Lowest Common Denominator. Just occasionally an atypical act - like Muse, for instance - will attract the attention of a major, having built up substantial groundroots support. Porcupine Tree and Dream Theater are both now reaping the rewards of a 15+ year-long struggle against the mainstream tide, having both signed recently to Roadrunner, one of the rare large labels with an independent attitude towards their roster. But for every band like them, another couple of dozen are waiting in the wings - some with sizeable fanbases who are more than happy to bankroll the band’s next release before it’s even recorded.
When people prophesy the death of the established music business accompanied by the sound of wailing and gnashing of teeth, my response is ‘bring it on’. Just about everyone producing worthwhile music will not suffer a great deal if most of the big record companies, along with the rest of the ideological infrastructure of the axis of mediocrity (such as the appalling NME or the dreaded Brit School) were to be flushed down the toilet of history.
On the subject of pre-orders, some people have been critical of the prices some bands are charging, with cries of ‘rip-off’. While I’d have to say that twenty-five squid is a lot to pay for ‘just a CD’, I prefer to think of it in terms as an investment in the band. What matters is not whether or not the CD alone gives value for money, but whether or not I get a return on that investment over the next year or so. In my case, that has included seeing those bands live multiple times, and making quite a few new friends though the fan communities. I certainly think I got my return on that investment last time round.
April 13th, 2008 at 9:34 am
On the subject of pre-orders, some people have been critical of the prices some bands are charging, with cries of ‘rip-off’. While I’d have to say that twenty-five squid is a lot to pay for ‘just a CD’, I prefer to think of it in terms as an investment in the band.
Hmm. I take a slightly different view. I’m happy to pay more for something special like the limited edition of Marillion’s ‘Marbles’ or Bass Communion’s ‘Pacific Codex’, and I’m willing to preorder quite a long time ahead to help a favoured band’s cash flow, but I certainly wouldn’t pay over the odds as a donation to a band. If I buy a CD, that’s a commercial transaction. I’m buying a product, not helping out my mates. If a band wants more, they need to provide more.
I can’t say I see it as an financial investment, either.
April 13th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
It’s definitely a financial investment, from where I sit. It keeps the band solvent, able to continue to produce music and hopefully tour.
Here in the States, I follow a bizarre little band called Railroad Earth. They’re a self-run shop, using a “major” label called SCIFidelity as their distributor (SCIFidelity is built for this purpose), and they basically tour non-stop with a month off here, a month of there.
I buy their merch, their CDs, anything, to help keep them running because they deserve to be. A lot of bands in the States are functioning this way now and it’s working, for some, more than others, but it’s working.
April 13th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
I love the web. It allows loads more people to repeat badly researched information and pass it off as their own stunning insights. The BRIT school has just had the most stunning ofsted report possible. (Check it. Its in the public Domain). The 8000+ students who have been there in the last 15 years have had an incredible diverse range of careers and educational success. Oh and by the way, 4 or 5 of them (in the last 4 or 5 years) got in the news a lot and maybe got exploited by the BPI. SO now it needs flushing because its some sort of factory for bad music. Man you know nothing
April 14th, 2008 at 8:48 am
The trouble with the web is it allows anonymous trolls to throw ad-hominem attacks around the moment anybody dares to express an opinion that they don’t like.
And, even though you may not like to be reminded of the fact, “a factory for bad music” is precisely what the Brit School represents to a great many music lovers, no matter how many world-class mechanical engineers or surgeons they might turn out.